|
|
|
|
Guidelines for 360/370 Students and Advisors Aim Overall Aim of the Thesis Program The primary goal of the thesis program is the development of independent research capabilities, culminating in the writing of a research paper. The program emphasizes creativity, independence and initiative on the part of the student. The primary goal is not necessarily for positive conclusive results in a given project, but for the development of skills which enable the student to complete a thorough literature search, design an experiment, analyze results and propose future experiments. In addition there should be close interaction between the student, faculty advisor and department members of the thesis committee. General Information The advisor should consider it his/her responsibility to guide the student to a project which may be, if properly executed and well understood, worthy of the distinction of honors. The advisor should also work with the student in the evaluation of data and in the correction of rough drafts. (The corollary to this, of course, is that the student should meet with her advisor frequently to discuss data, and should begin writing rough drafts and submitting them to the advisor as early as possible. A draft of the Introduction must be turned into the advisor by the January option date in order to proceed with a 370 in the second term.) Registration In order to continue thesis research for a second semester (BISC 370) the following requirements must be fulfilled: 1) A complete draft of the thesis Introduction must be turned in by the January option date. 2) The Thesis Committee (student, advisor, and two other faculty members) must have had at least one formal meeting/discussion. 3) The student's course grades must be maintained during BISC 360 research. If a student receives grades below the level achieved at the time her thesis project was approved, the Department will review the situation and determine whether the student may continue with the BISC 370. Receiving grades below a B during the first term will generally disqualify a student from the thesis program. Committee
Each year the Thesis Student's Co-ordinator for the Department will host a meeting for students and advisors in September to review the goals of the BISC 360/370 program and to answer questions. Thesis Students are strongly encouraged to attend these meetings. The co-ordinator this year (2007-2008) is Professor David Ellerby. In addition, the advisor and two faculty members of the committee should meet with the student during the first half of the 360 term. At this time the student should present an outline of the research project or preliminary data from previous work on the project. Ideally, the committee should meet with the student frequently, and each member should actively participate in the continuing evaluation and development of the project. Thesis At the time of the 370 due date, a copy should be delivered to:
(The student and advisor can usually use one of the
rough drafts.) There is no set length for the thesis. It should be as concise as possible while being a complete report of the research project. It is suggested that writing and rewriting of the thesis should be ongoing throughout both semesters of the project. A detailed draft of the Introduction should be reviewed with the advisor by the end of the first term, and is required prior to proceeding with the BISC 370. Rough drafts should be read by the advisor several times before the final draft is delivered to the Dean's Office. The thesis should be well written, neat in appearance and carefully proof-read. There are no requirements for binding of the thesis, but permanent binding should not be done until after the oral when final revisions are made. The copy to be given to the Biology Department should not be bound since it will be sent outside the College for binding. The Thesis should be written in journal format consisting of the following:
Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Tables and figures should be clearly presented in a form that would be acceptable to a major journal in the field. Raw data and detailed methods should be placed in appendices following the body of the thesis. Discussion Bibliography
Examples: Textbooks: Journal articles: Kemperman G, Gage FH. 1999. New nerve cells for the adult brain. Sci Am 48-53. References should be either numbered in the sequence in which they appear in the text or in alphabetical order by the first author. Determine which format your advisor prefers. Title Page The title page should include a copyright statement including the student's name, faculty advisor's name and the year. This material is copyrighted by student and advisor, date. Note: If students xerox drawings, etc. from copyrighted books or journals, these copies cannot come under the student's copyright. The source of each such figure must be acknowledged. After the oral examination, if the thesis committee recommends approval of the thesis for the degree with honors, the following statement should be added to the title page in the final copies of the thesis. This material is submitted as partial fulfillment of a B.A. degree with honors in major. Thesis Oral The advisor is responsible for scheduling the discussion and for making sure the committee members can come at that time. The advisor should consult the master schedule at the Department Office as well as the committee members' individual schedule. After a date and time at which all participants are able to attend has been chosen and agreed upon, the advisor should send letters of confirmation to each committee member. Individuals other than those on the Committee may attend the oral discussion at the invitation of the advisor. The advisor should consult with the student before issuing such an invitation. Requests to attend the discussion should be addressed to the advisor in advance. Presentation Questions should be directed towards clarification of methodology and data, and the evaluation of the data. The intent is to discover the depth of the students' understanding of the project and her ability to carry on independent research. Photography Money
Suggestions and
Recommendations Compile results as you go. Do not collect a notebook full of numbers and wait for the spring thaw to do calculations; compile tables and figures, and begin the evaluation of those data. The thesis should be typed on a word processor to allow for multiple revisions. The final copy should be printed on a laser printer. Backup your copy of the thesis frequently and keep copies in several places. Advisors Outside
of Wellesley Once a proposal has been accepted by the department, the following guidelines should be followed to insure that the research work and the thesis are progressing. 1. By the end of September, there should be an oral discussion between the on-campus advisor and the off-campus supervisor concerning the research project so that both parties are informed of the other's expectations regarding the student's level of independence and the laboratory's support of that student. The supervisor also should be informed that the on-campus advisor will direct the writing of the thesis. 2. During the first term, there should be an on-campus meeting of the full thesis committee, including the off-campus supervisor. The student will not be allowed to register for the 370 unless this meeting has taken place. 3. The student must meet with the on-campus advisor on at least a monthly basis throughout the year, to review research results and any changes in experimental plans. The student is encouraged to bring laboratory notebooks/ data and to prepare a short written summary for each of these meetings so that research progress is documented. 4. The finished thesis is generally due during the last week in April. The on-campus advisor will serve as the overseer of the written thesis, not the off-campus supervisor.* Since most theses require several written drafts prior to the final presentation, the on-campus advisor and the student should plan a schedule for submitting sections of the thesis for comments and evaluation by both advisor and supervisor. Input from the off-campus supervisor is encouraged, however, the student is ultimately responsible to the on-campus advisor for the written product. 5. As with on-campus theses, a complete draft of the Introduction is required by the end of the first term. A student may not continue with the second semester of research (BISC 370) unless the Introduction has been turned into the on-campus advisor. *[This division of labor must be made clear to the off-campus supervisor during the initial oral discussion in September.] |
Created By: Mimi Lai, '06, Kristen Roth, '06
Maintained By: Marcy Thomas
Created: June 23, 2004
Last Modified:
October 19, 2007
Expires: August 6, 2005