|
|
|
|
|
"While
the language may be lovely and the reasoning just, the ideas themselves
may prove trivial."
-Lu
Chi (from Wen Fu)
|
 |
Writing Prizes:
Winning
Essays
Three Generations
Prize for Writing in the Social Sciences
The Politics of School Choice: the Unusual Coalitions of the Voucher
Movement"
Ella Gao '01
Vouchers have increasingly become a popular form of education reform
in this nation. Both Milwaukee and Cleveland have private voucher programs,
and Florida recently instituted a program, where students of public schools
that have "failed" 2 years in a row, will be given vouchers to attend
any institution they wish.
During Election 2000 voucher initiatives were on ballot proposals in both
Michigan and California, and Texas, New Mexico, New Jersey, Pennsylvania,
and Arizona have either considered or are considering vouchers in some
form (Koch 4/9/00). The annual Phi Delta Kappa /Gallup poll of the public's
attitudes toward public schools also shows that as high as 45 percent
of respondents believe that the government should pay entirely or at least
a portion of the tuition for those who choose nonpublic schools (Lowell
and Gallup 9/00).
Despite the public attention vouchers have received however, only 3 areas
of the country have legislatively approved of publicly funded vouchers-Milwaukee,
Cleveland, and Florida. The Michigan and California proposals were both
defeated with 70 percent of voters opposed (Irwin 11/8/00; Folmar and
Bazeley 11/9/00).
If vouchers are so popular then why are they not being approved by in
state legislatures referendums?
The ability to advance issues is incredibly significant for without visible
supporters an issue loses momentum and appeal. Political scientist John
Kingdom stresses the importance of policy entrepreneurs in promoting issues.
When a policy window opens, they should be ready with ideas and proposals.
In fact, "An item's chances for moving up on an agenda are enhanced considerably
by the presence of a skilled entrepreneur, and dampened considerably if
no entrepreneur takes on the cause, pushes it, and makes the critical
couplings when a policy windows open" (Kingdon 1984 214). Although the
popularity of the voucher issue displays the opening of a policy window,
pro-voucher entrepreneurs have not been able to push vouchers effectively.
Their distinctive motivations for supporting vouchers and widely diverging
political ideologies have affected their abilities to work together. Anti-voucher
forces on the other hand are well-organized and well-funded. They include
most Democrats, teacher's unions, suburbanites, a few conservatives, and
members and supporters of organizations like the ACLU.
Furthermore, factions within the communities themselves make voucher advocacy
even more complex. While poor African-Americans support vouchers, the
organizations that supposedly represent blacks as a whole, the NAACP and
the Urban League do not. While the Catholic hierarchy has defended vouchers,
the laity is less enthusiastic.
The issue of vouchers is also a significant beyond education reform because
it presents important lessons in coalition building. Kingdon asserts that
while actual politicians are crucial to the passage of a proposal, an
issue must be pushed by a variety of players including academics, general
public opinion, interest groups, and even the mass media, which may provide
intense coverage on an issue. Consensus building is particularly important
as fragmentation can prove to be a major impediment to policy proposals.
Kingdon writes, "A more closely knit community generates common outlooks,
orientations, and ways of thinking" (1984 126). If people have a "common
language", they are better able to communicate with one another.
Back
to Writing Prizes
|