|
|
"While
the language may be lovely and the reasoning just, the ideas themselves
may prove trivial."
-Lu
Chi (from Wen Fu)
|
 |
Writing Prizes:
Winning
Essays
Three Generations
Prize for Writing in the Social Sciences
"Institutionalism:
A New Paradigm for the Social Sciences?"
Sonal Khullar '00
I. What is
institutionalism?
Institutionalism offers a multi-dimensional theory of social science that
borrows heavily from existing liberal / individualist and cultural approaches
to social organization. But are these borrowings so great as to render
the theory itself a cultural or liberal explanation under a different
label? Is it meaningful to distinguish an institutionalist pradigm? In
this paper, I shall argue that although institutionalism may employ some
of the tools or premises of cultural and liberal arguments, its conclusions
are quite different. Indeed, institutionalism arises from a critique of
these existing approaches and adapts them to form a new paradigm -- a
complex hybrid of what Peter Hall and Rosemary Taylor have labeled "the
calculus approach" and "the cultural approach". First of
all, it is important to establish that institutionalism is far from a
unified theory, but rather a broad label applied to quite divergent modes
of social analysis. These modes may be sub-divided into two basic types:
rational-choice and historical / sociological. Both grapple with the question
of how institutions, broadly defined to include formal or informal rules
or procedures in a society, influence human behavior and mediate between
human interests. The common denominator lies in their consideration of
institutional actors as independent and the belief that collective actions
cannot be explained by individual motivations. Beyond that, however, their
assumptions about individual behavior and their emphases on calculus /
cultural approaches result in radically different conclusions about institutional
origions, stability and the proces of changes.
...
II. Rational
Choice Institutionalism and its Critique of Neoclassical Theory
III. Historical
Institutionalism and its Critique of Rational Choice
IV. The Similaritiestoand
the Divergence from Cultural Theory
V. The Value
of Institutionalism
Back
to Writing Prizes
|